Are you able to submit a paper up to a scholarly, peer-reviewed log without PhD and obtain it accepted?


Are you able to submit a paper up to a scholarly, peer-reviewed log without PhD and obtain it accepted?

Are you able to submit a paper up to a scholarly, peer-reviewed log without PhD? More especially, just exactly just what is the minimum qualifications that will give one the chance associated with paper being posted in a peer-reviewed educational medium?

11 Responses 11

Submitting a educational paper for book (and possibly getting hired accepted) will not need any skills whatsoever. You do not need a PhD; you never also have to have visited university. There aren’t any academic, work, or account demands at all.

That’s not to say this’s an easy task to get yourself a paper accepted without any training that is formal the industry. Learning simple tips to compose a paper that is compelling less difficult when you yourself have a mentor to provide guidance. Nevertheless, when you can learn how to take action with out a PhD, in that case your insufficient a PhD won’t be held against you.

Yes, you can obtain a paper posted with no a PhD: PhD pupils do so on a regular basis. Presented documents are meant to be examined in accordance with whatever they state, perhaps perhaps not whom stated it.

Yes. In practice, graduate research is among the primary methods people achieve the abilities to publish this kind of paper, however a Ph.D. isn’t a requirement. Qualifications could be a range of the individual log, but I’m not sure of every which have a policy of requiring level qualifications from submitters. For instance, frequently graduate or students that are undergraduate such documents.

Being an extreme example, below are a few groundbreaking pre- or no-PhD discoveries:

Henri Lebesgue developed their famous integration concept as a new senior high school instructor in 1902.

Space–time block coding, a theoretical concept that happens to be important to cordless communications, ended up being developed in 1997 by Siavash Alamouti as a practicing engineer by having a master’s level.

The AKS primality test ended up being the consequence of 2002 research that is undergraduate the Indian Institute of tech.

It really is clear that such efforts warrant a book regardless of the writer’s status.

It is not only feasible however it is a requirement at numerous universities that your Ph.D thesis be entirely centered on peer evaluated documents.

Another problem this is actually the known proven fact that in technology just the research outcomes should make a difference, maybe maybe maybe not that is presenting those outcomes. If Prof. Dr browse around this web-site. X has submitted a paper that is discovered become wanting, then it ought to be refused. Then that paper should be accepted if John Doe Y who dropped out of primary school, submits a paper containing ground breaking results. Then that would mean that science is not conducted in an independent way if this were not (in principle) true. Arguments from authority, instead of those on the basis of the merits would for some level corrupt the clinical process.

I will be a little more skeptical compared to most of the responses.

The very first reason is more profane: you can find journals with additional reputation plus some with less reputation. The journals with additional reputation do have more visitors and if you should be posted in this paper, it will probably foster your reputation. The direct impact is everybody attempts to get published into the many prestigous journals. And so the editors have swamped with documents and must select by concern. If two email address details are equally impressive, the probability that the greater amount of experienced and scientist that is reputable be posted is quite high.

Therefore the standard approach is to get hold of the journals in descending purchase of reputation and request book. Therefore, yes, you may be posted, however it is most likely that a journal must be chosen by you with less reputation and that ensures that your outcomes could be ignored.

That get us to your second problem: then the editors will scan your paper more closely if you have an impressive result. Uncommon language (there was a specific lingo you employ in papers), strange structure (Word rather Latex) and a remarkable be a consequence of a person who isn’t understood before raises a red security. Then i say, nope, this is not remotely true if Anonymous Mathematica claims that “your lack of a PhD will not be held against you. It is extremely likely which you along with your paper aren’t scrutinized any longer and rejected. Than you can breathe if you try to battle the decision, the label crackpot is attached to you faster. So that you needs to be acutely careful to create a paper as amateur. Specially because you will find journals that are therefore. problematic that publishing here will damage your reputation.

An endorsement is used by the arXiv system to make sure that only people from universities and research facilities can submit documents; other individuals are locked down.

It is unfortunately necessary to contact someone from a university etc. which helps you to get through the barrier if you really have an impressive result: In both cases, arXiv and respectable journal.

Therefore, principially yes, but you can find obstacles. Never underestimate the issue.

IMPROVE: some given information in advance. The standing of the impact measures a journal element and since 2005 additionally because of the h-index. For 2013 Nature has ranking 7 when you look at the effect element with 38.6 and leads the h-index with 829. Technology has rank 20 (but is preceded by 9 (!) Nature specializations) and it is 2nd in the h-index with 801. So pretty essential journals. Nature provides a summary throughout the book procedure as well as in reality the rejection price steadily increased from 89% to 92per cent which I would call “swamping”.

Corvus now claims that my analysis is glaringly incorrect and provides the reason that other journals except Nature and Science lack the necessity to choose between papers, him right if I have understood.
Corvus, it really is your declare that other high-reputable journals both by h-index and effect element would not have the situation with selecting a paper and consequently high rejection prices ? Can you stay by the claim ? If my info is outdated or simply just incorrect, I quickly will retract it, but We will research it. Glaringly incorrect, yes or no ?

JeffE, can you concur that being of user of this Computer Science Department in Illinois (which incidentally built the ORDVAC and ILLIAC and tend to be presently accountable for the LLVM Compiler Infrastructure) with a tremendously tradition that is long an very very own ACM chapter might offer a paper some suggestion ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.